
Welcome back to the newsletter! Thanks for being here. If you’re new here, or reading this somewhere other than your inbox, make sure you’re subscribed:
We’re got a fiction-heavy issue for you this month! In addition to our fortuitous feature (Gina signed up to write this piece before being elevated to Associate Fiction Editor!), we’re further peeling back the curtain on what Okay Donkey fiction editors want to read by sharing more answers from last month’s Editor AMA.
Don’t forget to scroll down and check out what our past contributors are up to, and of course read what Okay Donkey published in January. Enjoy!
🫏 OKD Updates
We’re excited to announce that Gina Thayer has been elevated to Associate Fiction Editor from Lead Fiction Reader! Learn more about how Gina interprets Okay Donkey’s mission to showcase “the odd, the off-kilter, and the just plain weird” in our feature below.
And a big thank you to everyone who applied to be a Reader! We received a truly astounding number of applications, and our editors are working through those now. Everyone will get a response in due course!
🌟 Ways to Weird Your Work
by Gina Thayer, Associate Fiction Editor
Here at Okay Donkey, we’re always looking for “the odd, the off-kilter, and the just plain weird.” But what does it mean for a piece of writing to be “weird,” and what makes a story or poem cross the weirdness threshold?
Many people use the term “weird fiction” to describe a subgenre of speculative fiction that blends horror, surrealism, and other fantastic elements. It can also be used more broadly to describe writing that in some way bends perception, subverts expectations, or otherwise offers a surprising reading experience via content, form, or perspective.
Today, I’m sharing a few potential avenues (there are so many!) through which to “weird” your work and steep your writing in the unexpected.
Embrace speculation.
Building a speculative element into your work — something that strains or breaks the expectations of our “normal” world — gives readers an opportunity to encounter something they’ve never imagined before. It’s also a great tool to build resonant metaphors, approach a theme from a new angle, or contemplate an exciting “what if?” scenario. From my perspective, adding a dollop (or a shovelful) of speculation is one of the fastest ways to disrupt an otherwise expected narrative, and infuse it with a dose of weird.
Skew chronology.
Few things are weirder than time itself. If you usually write linear narratives where time marches neatly forward, consider how a non-linear progression might destabilize or reinvigorate the story you’re telling. How does the order in which you reveal information draw attention to different themes, plot-points, or emotional truths within your piece? Let the flow of time take you somewhere new, whether it spirals, cycles, runs backward and sideways, or radiates like spokes from a central moment.
Upend structure.
Shaking up how a piece is structured can have a massive impact on the overall weird-factor. This might involve changing the order in which your story unfolds (see above), injecting an unexpected point of view, adding or subverting predictable rhythms (like starting every line with the same word or phrase), or manipulating how you engage with formatting — what happens if you break your story into short, numbered segments vs. one long block of text? Does your poem stick to the left margin, or do words sprawl across the page? To what effect?
Word choice, baby.
Perhaps this one is obvious, but diction and syntax are great tools for infecting your writing with the off-kilter. Unexpected phrasing, a description from a funky angle, or building contrast between tone and content (like presenting bizarre events in a matter-of-fact tone, or vice versa) can introduce weirdness where there previously was none.
With great weirdness comes great responsibility! Here are a few potential pitfalls to be mindful of as you go forth into the weird:
Don’t abandon craft.
It may be tempting to think that writing a mind-bending, trippy, off-the-wall piece means you don’t have to worry about pesky little things like characterization, pacing, or rhythm and sound. And while I’m all for rejecting “traditional” craft expectations, the best weirdness (in my opinion) works in tandem with other craft techniques, rather than sidestepping them.
Beware style over substance.
This one can be tricky because as a reader, I’m open to pieces that thoughtfully prioritize vibes and “experience” over a classic plot progression. But I still want whatever weirdness is happening in a story to feel meaningful and significant, rather than incidental to whatever else is going on. I find it helps to dig for a “why” behind the weird, lest your piece end up feeling flashy but forgettable.
Be respectfully weird.
Keep in mind that what is weird to one person may not be weird to another. Particularly when adding speculative elements, be wary of presenting something as strange or “other” that might be part of someone else’s culture, preferences, or lived experience. Hopefully this one goes without saying, regardless of your story’s weirdness.
Ultimately, weirdness is both a craft technique and a creative muscle. You may have to flex it a few times before it starts to feel natural. But whether you’re new to the weird or already firmly entrenched, it’s always a good time to celebrate weirdness in your writing. So have fun, take care of each other, and send us your weird work!
💬 OKD Editor AMA: More Fiction!
Last month, we published our OKD Editor AMA! This month, we’ve got more answers for you from the world of fiction from Steve Chang (Fiction Editor) and Heidi Marjamäki (Associate Fiction Editor/Managing Editor).
What is the biggest green flag in flash fiction, immediately inviting the editors to consider this piece for publication?
Steve Chang: Too many to list. I’m looking for vision, control, and audacity. I like conviction. But most importantly: if you can make me curious, make me care, I’ll keep reading.
Heidi Marjamäki: I like to feel like I’m in confident hands. Like the writer is intentional and things are on the page for a reason, not just because at some point the writer happened to write something. I’m also a sucker for a great voice.
What is the biggest turn off in flash fiction, an immediate "No" from the editors?
Steve: Unnecessary gore, violence etc. Work trying to “shock” or “impress” the reader. It feels…grubby. For me, personally. I’m also not a fan of “it was all a dream” stories. I’m like: Why’re you telling me your dreams? Are we dating? I’m also not a fan of “riddle” stories. You know, when the ending reveals that the narrator was a banana or something. OK. It’s a banana. Now what? Submit a story, not a writing exercise.
Heidi: Agreed. I’m also not a huge fan of “hermit crab” type pieces. I’m always more interested in a straightforward narrative where the story is good and the writing is strong. There’s nowhere to hide!
Would you consider a story that takes place over a prolonged period of time, but is told through focusing on a single detail/change as flash fiction? Do you prioritize the narrative?
Heidi: Yes, story is a must. Something has to happen.
Steve: As long as a piece can answer the question, “So what?” Why this day, this incident, this period of time, this seedling, etc. I love narrative but what constitutes a story — the definition encompasses a lot. Surprise us.
Do you usually know from the first few lines if a story is getting a rejection/acceptance? Or after completely reading the piece?
Steve: With rejections, I can tell pretty quickly. With acceptances, not always. If the real question is whether your pieces get read all the way through, they’re all reviewed by at least three readers.
Heidi: Also, most things we receive will be rejected because we simply can’t publish everything that’s submitted to us. That means that when I pick up a piece to read it, it’s many times more likely that it will be rejected, rather than accepted. When something does catch my eye, it’s a really lovely feeling.
📚 January at OKD
“Quack,” poetry by Julliette Holliday
“Moo Moo,” flash fiction by Christine Aletti
“Gettysburg 2019,” poetry by Allie Hoback
“Family Double-Dare, ‘The Lima Beings vs. Toledo TNT,’ June 1991,” flash fiction by T.J. Martinson
“The Farmer,” poetry by Andrew Doll
🔎 Check Us Out
We love when past contributors keep us updated on their lives! If your work has ever appeared in OKD, reach out and tell us about your new book, project, album, etc. We’ll give you a shoutout on our socials and here in the newsletter.

Chloe N. Clark’s story collection Every Galaxy a Circle is out now. (OKD: “Things People Have Written in Letters to Ghosts,” Oct. 2019; “On the Point Between You and Infinity,” Sept. 2018)
Bill Verble’s debut poetry collection Absence Descending is available now. (OKD: “My Next Life,” Jan. 2022)
Gordon Brown’s haiku chapbook Skin Crawls is out now. (OKD: “Ghouls,” Oct. 2022)
OKD Fiction Editor Steve Chang (with former Guernica editor Autumn Watts) is offering more Revision Workshops through Lit Match Collective on February 28 and March 28. (This workshop is free for our newsletter readers — just fill out the linked form and you’re all set.)
Get in touch: Submissions • Bluesky • Instagram • Discord

